What you do is you
start a bank, then by sleight of hand you convince everyone that while you only
have 10 units of coin in your coffers you can lend out 100 or even a 1000. It’s
called fractional reserve banking. It’s legal. It means that you suddenly have
10-100x more money than you originally had. Then, once you have this funny money,
lend it out but demand that it be repaid with real money, plus interest of
course. You can do this at a small scale in your community, but once you get
really good at it you can institute it a national level with a central bank.
Most countries have a central bank that’s tied into the network of central
banks; the few countries that weren’t tied in, like Yugoslavia and Libya, were –
shall we say – chastised and brought into line. So once you have a central
bank linked into the network you can cause all kinds of disruptions across
the whole system – sorry, let me say that differently: WE can cause
disruptions across the system, including in YOUR country.
However, sometimes monetary
disruptions are not enough because people are smart and they start to
circumvent the system with barter, alternative currencies and other fanciful
ideas. Then you need to act physically through the other limb on this beast:
politics.
If you’re dealing
with a dictatorship in a Middle Eastern or African country, a nice way to do it
is to roll in this large horse called democracy. Fill it with a bunch of
backward religionist crazies – actually, just fill it with any group that wants power, it really doesn't matter who they are – fund and arm them, give them a lofty name and then
send them out on the streets. At the same time, ensure that you have a hip-sounding
slogan that the “empowered” youth can cling onto, and then bombard social media
with it; anyone who’s anyone will want to be part of this great movement. So
roll in the horse with the crazies, get the Starbuckers hip to the idea and
then roll out the plan. It sounds a bit disorderly, but that's precisely what you want. Disorder. We
have organizations in these countries that can stage-manage these things. They
are called NGOs. A lot of hip people want to work for NGOs. I swear, we get
thousands of applicants a week. There’s no lack of volunteers. They don’t cost much, they
are mostly useful idiots that work for nothing and have no idea who and what they’re
subverting. It works well.
Of course, if you
actually want to move in physically you cannot do anything without
international buy-in. We cannot deploy our arsenal without the fat slob on the
couch and the social justice warrior on TV giving us a thumbs-up – it’s
unbelievable but it is like that – so we must demonstrate to these clowns that
action is necessary. This is where the media comes in.
What you do is, during the media-fed frenzy, you throw in a few agent-provocateurs to throw rocks and Molotov cocktails. People get hurt and bingo, the local law enforcement gets heavy handed and we have it on video. Usually that is not enough, but you can always get one of the local opposition groups to commit a false flag; promise them power and they’ll do just about anything. They want “democracy” so badly they are willing to use deception and force to install it. Don’t ask questions, it just works.
What you do is, during the media-fed frenzy, you throw in a few agent-provocateurs to throw rocks and Molotov cocktails. People get hurt and bingo, the local law enforcement gets heavy handed and we have it on video. Usually that is not enough, but you can always get one of the local opposition groups to commit a false flag; promise them power and they’ll do just about anything. They want “democracy” so badly they are willing to use deception and force to install it. Don’t ask questions, it just works.
So now we have
skirmishes and tension, and all eyes on country X. We want that. This is
important. Keep fires blazing all the time. Never let people look inward. Always
keep fires blazing somewhere. It’s very important because it keeps eyes off
of us. Keep up the strategy of tension, but if you really want to bring a
large body of people under control it is not enough to keep their minds
occupied with tension, you need to enter them into the fray either voluntarily
as a fait accompli. In non-Western countries, you can usually just buy a
Security Council resolution and do as you please. But in Western countries you
can’t do that. Large scale invasions wouldn’t stand these days. Outward
aggression is still recognized as such. So you must be more subtle than that.
Do not use outward aggression in your backyard. You must subdue the people
differently.
You do it like this: just get everybody to agree on certain principles, and make sure that disagreeing with these principles is at first frowned upon and eventually grounds for social exclusion and ostracism. You have to build that up by gradualism. It takes a generation or two. Make sure that a person’s standing in society becomes dependent on his endorsement of these principles. This is subtle and requires that the dissemination and upholding of these principles be institutionalized and their enforcement “policed” until people start to police themselves. You will not need a thug with a ski mask to do this; a little lady with a website will be quite enough to shame people. Once you have created this culture, be sure to expand it and to harmonize it as widely as possible. It will take some work and a lot of it will be performed in the media because you must erode long-standing traditions. Of course, you will have one thing in your favour: people die and traditions die with them. The generations that follow will not know, let alone embrace these traditions. They will be far more responsive to the passive-aggressive threats of the little old lady than to any real outward threat, because – as you will discover – the threat of ridicule is so overwhelmingly crippling to a Westerner that he would rather forsake reason than to bear even for an instant this unpleasantness. This is a weakness that you must prey on. Once you have instituted this, you will officially have yourself a politically correct society. It’s wonderful. It’s like a floppy rag-doll you can prick pins into at will. Also, it costs virtually nothing!
You do it like this: just get everybody to agree on certain principles, and make sure that disagreeing with these principles is at first frowned upon and eventually grounds for social exclusion and ostracism. You have to build that up by gradualism. It takes a generation or two. Make sure that a person’s standing in society becomes dependent on his endorsement of these principles. This is subtle and requires that the dissemination and upholding of these principles be institutionalized and their enforcement “policed” until people start to police themselves. You will not need a thug with a ski mask to do this; a little lady with a website will be quite enough to shame people. Once you have created this culture, be sure to expand it and to harmonize it as widely as possible. It will take some work and a lot of it will be performed in the media because you must erode long-standing traditions. Of course, you will have one thing in your favour: people die and traditions die with them. The generations that follow will not know, let alone embrace these traditions. They will be far more responsive to the passive-aggressive threats of the little old lady than to any real outward threat, because – as you will discover – the threat of ridicule is so overwhelmingly crippling to a Westerner that he would rather forsake reason than to bear even for an instant this unpleasantness. This is a weakness that you must prey on. Once you have instituted this, you will officially have yourself a politically correct society. It’s wonderful. It’s like a floppy rag-doll you can prick pins into at will. Also, it costs virtually nothing!
Meanwhile, back in
the tension-zone, our people will be supporting opposition groups, possibly
with weapons but not necessarily. It is actually best to let things happen
“organically” e.g. to incite repressive elements in the country and get some
footage of ensuing violence, especially on women and children. You must try to
have all German housewives crying, desperate with historical guilt; let them beg
their leaders to help X, Y and Z per the footage.
Footage is
remarkably effective. We did it recently. Children die by the thousands daily –
THOUSANDS and in the most horrendous conditions of slavery, famine and so on –
but we put our money on this piece of footage – it wasn’t even footage, just a
single photo of a Syrian boy who drowned trying to escape with his idiot-father
from one of our tension-zones. We knew it might have traction because it had
the right elements. Of course, we ordered all our captured-outlets like the BBC
to flog this and, if possible, spruce it up with sound effects and the right voice-tonalities,
but we had no idea it would spread so virulently. Sometimes we are amazed at
the effectiveness even of our own tactics and how benighted and hypnotized is
our target audience. Sidebar. The point being, you get some footage,
disseminate it, you pull at heart strings, you demonize opposition based on the
policed-principles (abovementioned), and once the fat-slob and the social
justice warrior are on-board, you can do as you please. The fat slobs are the fatuous
horde at the rear; while the SJWs are the shrill frontline of your “free” army
of idiots. Simple media propaganda can override even the most well-reasoned
argumentation.
As a general rule, do
not concern yourself with logic. We are in an era of rhetoric. That is the only
thing that matters. You will never once hear a statistic cited as a reason to
act. But you will see an unverified piece of footage be used for that very
purpose. Do not bother with logic. Logic is effete. It’s for academics. Just
follow the rule: the greater the tension, the greater the thrust. Do not worry
about intellectual footing and legitimacy. So if you want to overrun Europe
with refugees you must create a huge amount of tension, not a logical argument.
The tension is the fuel; it propels the agenda. If your agenda is to overthrow
a government, you will need a vast force. If your agenda is mass-displacement of
peoples, you will likewise need a vast compelling force. Simply put: TENSION=FUEL.
But when you ignite that fuel, you better know what direction it’s pointing in;
you better have a plan, otherwise it can blow up in your hands. We have had this
happen to us, for instance, when we fucked with the Russians. People can be aimless
– this we can deal with – but we
cannot. We have to know what we want. In this case we are aiming for a broad-scale
destabilization of Europe. It is not in our interest to have these large
ethnically homogeneous nations in Europe. We cannot have that. It is not
possible to control such units even with interlinked central banks. It is much
easier to control countries that are struggling with constant and intense
internal strife. Cohesion is not in our interest, at least not cohesion as defined
by national self-determination.
Now, you may find this
difficult to believe, but all of this can be done from a very high level with
very little exposure. You will recall from history that some very important transformations were
fomented as off the books black-operations. Remember, it is MUCH easier to
create tension than it is to create harmony. Look at what happened in
Paris. A couple of months of planning, a
few useful idiots and the entire city is locked down and the country is under
martial law. I REPEAT: It is very
easy to create tension. Very very easy
and very, very cheap. Furthermore, tension you can do in the dark; harmony you
must create in the light of day. So it is fortunate that we are not interested
in the latter.
To get to practical
matters, what will you need to create tension? Well, you will need many things,
but you will need this first and foremost: MONEY. No one works for free, and
even if they do, they still need to eat and, if they are armed, they need to be
supplied and resupplied. There is no escaping it. There will always be a need
for MONEY and there will ALWAYS be people who are willing to kill for it. Luckily
we have money, since we can conjure it out of thin air and multiply it.
If I were foolish
enough to suggest to our enemies a means to root us out and lay bare our plot, I
would tell them simply this: if you want to find out who we are then follow the
age-old adage: Follow the money.
And if in the process of your investigations you get lost and confused, then I would
tell you to follow an even older adage: cui bono? – who benefits?
But would I be so
stupid to cast pearls before swine?